To: don-o
This is incoherent and illiterate.
It also wants us to accept prima facie statements made concerning innocence which is what is otherwise objected to if the argument is prima facie acceptance of guilt.
To: ifinnegan
It also wants us to accept prima facie statements made concerning innocence which is what is otherwise objected to if the argument is prima facie acceptance of guilt. Probable cause - Piffle - Right?
No general warrant - Piffle - Right?
No excessive bail - Piffle - Right?
Presumption of innocence - Piffle - Right?
Freedom to assemble and associate - Piffle - Right?
22 posted on
06/03/2015 9:33:10 AM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: ifinnegan
ooooh latin...you must be right!
30 posted on
06/03/2015 9:51:33 AM PDT by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: ifinnegan
It also wants us to accept prima facie statements made concerning innocence which is what is otherwise objected to if the argument is prima facie acceptance of guilt. Why shouldn't we accept the idea that people are innocent until proven guilty?
Why does doing so appear to bother you so much?
40 posted on
06/03/2015 10:06:38 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson