Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Racial Penalties in Baltimore Mortgages (Oh, the Hugemanatee)
NYTimes ^ | May 30, 2015 | THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Posted on 05/31/2015 2:53:23 PM PDT by PROCON

The mortgage crisis that brought the economy to its knees seven years ago was especially devastating for black communities, where homeowners who qualified for safe, traditional mortgages were often steered into ruinously priced loans that paid off handsomely for brokers and lenders while leaving borrowers vulnerable to foreclosure. The crisis left many middle-class minority communities strewn with abandoned houses, further widening the already huge wealth gap between African-Americans and whites.

A study published this month in the journal Social Problems lays out how this happened in Baltimore in the run-up to the recession and comes at a time when the banking industry and its friends in Congress are fighting proposed federal rules that would make it much easier to ferret out discrimination and enforce fair-lending laws.

The research, by the sociologists Jacob Rugh, Len Albright and Douglas Massey, focuses on 3,027 loans made in Baltimore from 2000 to 2008 by Wells Fargo, which in 2012 agreed to pay $175 million to settle allegations of predatory lending in Baltimore and elsewhere. The study takes into account credit scores, income, down payments — all of the information that was available to brokers and lenders when these loans were made.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: baltimore; blackkk; elijahcummings; maryland; minorities; mortages; racism; thepoor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants
In fact it was DemocRats who coerced banks into making risky loans.

Yes indeed, and in fact... they did this in order to make loans more accessible to minorities.

21 posted on 05/31/2015 3:26:31 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I see what you did there, using the insulting term for Barney Frank’s boyfriend. But you are literally correct in that description LOL.


22 posted on 05/31/2015 3:28:10 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Tell it, brother.

Most people don’t get what happened, or how important it was.


23 posted on 05/31/2015 3:32:18 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
The mortgage crisis that brought the economy to its knees seven years ago was especially devastating for black communities, where homeowners who qualified for safe, traditional mortgages were often steered into ruinously priced loans that paid off handsomely for brokers and lenders while leaving borrowers vulnerable to foreclosure.

I'm calling possible BS on this one. I'm sure there are people who'd do this (regardless of the race of the borrower), but someone across town will give you the best deal your credit will qualify you for. I'm sure there are cases where this happened to blacks, but till I see some real statistics, I'm not convinced this was done to minorities any more than it was done to whites, given equal credit histories.

24 posted on 05/31/2015 3:33:34 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lordpumblechook

or too stupid to hire a lawyer for $500 to advise them...


25 posted on 05/31/2015 3:35:14 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Didn’t Bawney Fwank have his hand involved in that debacle too?

I'd just as soon not know where Barney Fag's hands have been, thank you.

26 posted on 05/31/2015 3:36:38 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
I couldn't bring myself to read past the B.S. that was the 1st sentence. I was in the mortgage business in the early-mid 2000s (also in the mid 80s-early 90s, but that was a different time & environment).

These borrowers weren't steered away from "safe, traditional" loans because they weren't qualified for them in the first place. They were sub-prime borrowers, at best, and many of them had no place borrowing $$ (either on a purchase or refi). NINA loans (no income, no asset verification) were a joke.

Also, during this 2nd time period in the mortgage business, I never once met a borrower in person. It was all done over the phone & via the mail, so I never knew (or cared) what their ethnic background was. (Yes, it was a section on the last page of the app, but it's not something to which I paid any attention - it would've been illegal & discriminatory if I had.)

27 posted on 05/31/2015 3:48:36 PM PDT by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

FReepers! Let's go!
Everyone needs to help!


Please contribute today!

Let's Git-R-Done! Tomorrow is June!

28 posted on 05/31/2015 3:51:26 PM PDT by RedMDer (Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: usconservative

You are correct sir! You also should mention bow Rainbow Push and other groups extorted banks to make loans to unqualified minority borrowers. And the banking examiners looked the other way.


29 posted on 05/31/2015 3:52:36 PM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Didn’t Bawney Fwank have his hand involved in that debacle too?

I'd just as soon not know where Barney Fag's hands have been, thank you

someone told Barney to "Belt Up"


30 posted on 05/31/2015 3:58:20 PM PDT by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Only the government is permitted to engage predatory lending. (What is the national debt now?)


31 posted on 05/31/2015 4:23:07 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

32 posted on 05/31/2015 4:26:18 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Prejudice and generalizations. That's how Collectivists roll......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Yep—that’s a true, though the mortgage banks piled on by also fraudulently selling a lot of bad, bundled/securitized mortgages into the private market, too.


33 posted on 05/31/2015 4:28:17 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

OMG?

or BFD?


34 posted on 05/31/2015 4:30:33 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

This is exactly right. Bank of America pulled out of our state because they couldn’t afford to continue to make the bad loans that were required by the feds under the CRA in order to continue to do business.


35 posted on 05/31/2015 4:34:08 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

A lot of those mortgage companies were actually run by blacks. I sold my house to a (nice) black family and they used a minority mortgage company that didn’t know its a-hole from breakfast and caused a major delay in the closing. That p*ssed me off, but the buyer had it worse - he was running around with his furniture in a truck for days because of it. I ended up letting him put it in the garage before the sale closed.


36 posted on 05/31/2015 4:48:14 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
starts out with..."while leaving borrowers vulnerable to foreclosure."

then comes to this conclusion.

Over the life of a 30-year loan, the researchers say, these racial disparities would cost the average black borrower an extra $14,904 — and $15,948 for the average black borrower living in a black neighborhood — as compared with white borrowers. That money might otherwise have been put into savings, invested in children’s education, or used to improve health or living standards.

huh ? but not stopping foreclosure ?

Comes to $531 bucks a year---
37 posted on 05/31/2015 6:05:43 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Eddie Mush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
As someone with over 30 yrs in the mortgage biz I must agree with the other posters who lay the blame with our government.

CRA and HUD enforcers (headed by Andrew Cuomo) forced mortgage companies to make sketchy loans and FNMA and FHLMC scooped them up.

And, as another poster pointed out, nobody was forced to take out these mortgage.

38 posted on 05/31/2015 6:25:12 PM PDT by mcenedo (lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Since when does one’s credit report rely on skin color? If I had gobs of money to lend out I would only lend to people who are likely to pay me back, otherwise I’d be a poor and failed businessman.


39 posted on 05/31/2015 6:31:25 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

And let me guess, black families that pay their bill sand live within their means somehow were able to keep their homes and borrow more at better rates, news at 11.


40 posted on 05/31/2015 8:39:51 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? (A socialist is a communist who realizes he must suckle the breast of Capitalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson