Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: OK Sun

I do not want full auto capabilities, neither with NFA paperwork nor by working around the law to achieve the same effect. I want every single trigger pull to result in a hit. Others may have different priorities, but my ammo is too expensive and too heavy to be used in bulk. The law they are working around is unconstitutional and deserves to be circumvented, but I won’t be the one doing it.


5 posted on 05/27/2015 7:25:19 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

Sometimes you just need a m249. Not generally in a civilian role but it’s a niche.


7 posted on 05/27/2015 7:28:47 AM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1
I want every single trigger pull to result in a hit

I'd kind of like a three-round burst capability - without NFA entanglements.
Never shot one, but it's attractive; with a 5.56 seems like all three would hit... that's a 10-target engagement limitation, but mag changes are fast.

10 posted on 05/27/2015 7:31:12 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1
The law they are working around is unconstitutional and deserves to be circumvented,

It needs to be repealed or overthrown, not circumvented.

Were that to happen, I'd have true select-fire rifles just because.

11 posted on 05/27/2015 7:33:47 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson