Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dp0622
As a civilian, I’m not sure why military leaders would be against this.

In the event of an accidental/negligent discharge, they might look bad to the higher-ups. The best ass-covering move is an outright ban.

14 posted on 05/20/2015 5:41:10 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Future Snake Eater

Been there, done that. Vietnam era through early 70’s pay officers carried personal sidearms as it was easier than hassle of drawing from the arms room. Lots of souvenir pistols from RVN at that time, I carried mine. Then they cracked down.

Historically, personal sidearms were permitted if chambered for the issue service cartridge.

Joined National Guard in 1974 & most officers carried their own sidearms in the field. Somehow that all got swept away as MPs & CID were simply looking for excuses to bust people, IMO.

If a soldier or officer meets the standard for concealed carry & has commander’s authorization to carry based on need, then by all means make it happen. If Achmed & Hassan don’t know who’s packing on post, then it becomes a safer place.


15 posted on 05/20/2015 6:04:18 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson