I do not reject the possibility that he was actually born in Hawaii, I just reject the assertion that it has been proven to the necessary degree which should be required.
One does not play hanky panky games with something as mundane as a birth certificate unless someone has something to hide.
How do you propose that it be proved to a greater degree?
Consider the possibility that “playing hanky-panky” was a political strategy designed to galvinize support from the liberal base and to demonize one’s opposition as racist without ever needing to use the term. Who are the other constituency groups that have their citizenship status questioned? Its Latinos and Asians. Obama got 73% of the Asian American vote and 71% of the Latino vote. Together that was 15% of the electorate and coupled with the black vote, 28% of the electorate.
“Take what your opposition considers to be your weakness and make it your strength.” — Saul Alinsky, Rules For Radicals