Replies

>>>I wish the guy would cite the source of the UNALTERED image of Stanley Dunahm Sr. and Ann Dunham. The only place I can find it is on pages discussing the altered photos.

Therein lies the problem with ALL of this stuff. You can't truth ANYTHING anymore. It's like having a conversation ith a 9-11 truth who says there were no planes....then you say "really" and show them video....then they say "nobody saw planes it was added later" then you point them to hundreds of man on the street interviews at the time....

I've learned its best to leave the under-medicated alone to their fantasies.

Recently I've been battling a rash of false pics on Facebook. One of a tornado SUCKING UP a rainbow and the other was a tornado sucking up a lightning bolt. Now, I'm a meteorologist for the military and have been one for 28 years...and that street cred only got me rebuke by people who just couldn't grasp the fact that people lie.

A RAINBOW being SUCKED up by a TORNADO. I am guessing the quality of education in the sciences just ins't what it used to be and even good conservative people have lost the ability to use common sense and discernment.

OK I just had some time to look this over. The YouTube guy is obviously a fraud and the so-called original image of Stanley and Ann is the one that has been altered.

I believe there are many questions about some of Obama's early-life photos' particularly the airport ones. But when you are dealing with Marxists and Alinsky-ites you have to question EVERYTHING thing you see, especially stuff being presented that seems to be supporting your views. That's the most vulnerable spot that con-men look for.

The so called "original image" of Stanley and Ann has a huge portion of the image that needed to be "manufactured" after Barack was removed. If you look over to the right side of this image you will see straight edges and obvious repeating patterns that would not occur in that kind of brick (or anywhere in an old fuzzy photograph.) The person who altered it used the "clone-stamp" tool to recreate the needed brick wall from the original photo. It is one of the cheesiest, lamest Photoshop efforts I've ever seen. And frankly that's probably intentional -- to make it easy for the Huff-Po bloggers to "discover" and point out.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if there was an effort out there to generate huge numbers of imaginary bloggers and fake researchers creating awful attempts to "disprove" Obama's past and stir it all in with the handful of serious efforts that really do raise real questions about him. I don't have any evidence that that is going on, but it would certainly fit what I know about leftists and stop-at-nothing marxists and what their ilk have tried to pull off in the past.