Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/06/2015 7:54:23 AM PDT by bananaman22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bananaman22

So now does Shell move its operations elsewhere and Seattle lose the jobs/tax revenue generated?


2 posted on 05/06/2015 7:56:19 AM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
I'm not quite sure how the city can randomly single out a single company for extra permits and regulations.. Don't think they can do that when it comes down to the courts. Of course, all they're really looking for is to delay Shell enough to miss the drilling season. Yet Shell’s local contractor, Foss Maritime, insists that the current permit was sufficient to dock Shell’s ships. In fact, Paul Query, a spokesperson for Foss, criticized the Mayor’s opposition. “The mayor’s action…raises grave concerns about his stated commitment to Seattle’s thriving maritime community,” Queary said in a written statement. “By giving a small but vocal group the ability to jeopardize the commercial relationships between our local maritime businesses and the Port of Seattle, the mayor is casting serious doubt on the future of the city’s working waterfront.”
4 posted on 05/06/2015 9:08:43 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

I thought the Port Authority decided to tell the City to GFY? Also, the local greenies keep reporting this as a “rig” when it’s just a few tugs and an exploration ship.


6 posted on 05/06/2015 9:33:08 AM PDT by brothers4thID (Be professional, be courteous, and have a plan to kill everyone in the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson