Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

E. R. Langenbach, letter to the New York Times Book Review, May 2, 1977
Thomsen accuses Dr. Velikovsky of cabalistic reasoning, of "relying on correspondences of sound, such as Pereset and Persian." This statement is a pure fabrication -- some of that "downright imagination" of which Thomsen disapproves. Dr. Velikovsky points out (p. 35) that "in the hieroglyphic texts of the Persian era... Persia is always called P-r-s" and that in the Canopus Decree, cut in stone, in 238 B.C., the Persians are referred to as P-r-s-tt. (There were no vowels in the alphabet.) The Canopus Decree is written both in Egyptian and in Greek. In Egyptian it describes the carrying off of the sacred images of Egypt by the Pereset and in Greek it tells of them being carried off by the Persians. But Dr. Velikovsky did not limit his identification of the Pereset as Persians to this evidence, although it would have been enough for a less careful and exacting scholar. In addition, he compares the clothing, armaments and appearances of the Persian soldiers and officers, as they are depicted in the bas reliefs in Persepolis and Nakhsh-i-Rustam, with those of the Pereset as depicted in the murals of the temple at Habinet Habu. The striking similarities are unmistakable. Finally, Dr. Velikovsky compares, step by step, the events described in annals left by Ramses III of his war with the Pereset and the Peoples of the Sea, with the descriptions by Diodorus of Sicily of the details of the war of Nectanebo I against the Persians and the Greek mercenaries. This comparison is made in such meticulous detail that the only logical conclusions are that both were describing the same war; that the Pereset and the Persians were the same people and that Ramses III was the Pharaoh whom the Greeks called "Nectanebo I." Incidentally, Dr. Velikovsky, quoting E. Wallis Budge, The Book of Kings (London 1908) Vol. II p. I, points out that one of the "Horus names" of Ramses III was Nectanebo (Nekht-a-neb).

So much for Tomsen's accusations of cabbalistic reasoning and making "archeology out of anomalies."

51 posted on 05/03/2015 4:50:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

The “Peleset” among the Sea Peoples are usually equated with the Philistines. The Persians weren’t anywhere in the area c. 1200 B.C.


53 posted on 05/03/2015 4:54:15 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

So are you saying that Ramses the Great was not the Pharaoh of the Exodus?

Do you know who was?


56 posted on 05/03/2015 5:00:49 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson