[WilliamIII]

He wasn’t born in 1 AD.

Every idiot knows that “AD” means “in the year of our Lord — anno domini”. The year 1 is the year that people thought Jesus was born, when the AD dating system was started. We’re still using the AD — “in the year of our Lord” — dating system. We’re still dating our calendar from the year in which that the calendar’s authors thought Jesus was born. But PC leftist have changed AD to BCE in order to try to deny that they’re using the Christian dating system. PC always denies reality — that’s what it’s all about.

[Tzfat]

So since we all know He was born earlier, shouldn’t we change the dating? I mean really, you guys are simply dishonoring Him by using a freak from the sixth century faulty dating mechanism.

If you are so against renaming a bad dating systems, why not abandoned the gregorian dating too. That was a modern innovation too...

[Texas Fossil]

PC always denies reality — that’s what it’s all about.

Absolutely. They MUST LIE, no one would ever vote for them if they told the truth.

--

Somewhere within boundaries of illusion, lies & deception is reality of Modern Day Liberalism. Daylight disinfectant destroys it.

[Tzfat]

The year 1 is the year that people thought Jesus was born, when the AD dating system was started.

But He wasn't born in 1 CE. He was born between 4 and 6 BCE, and every idiot that knows history knows that.

You are like the COBOL coder from 1999 that insists that we should still be using two digit years. Sheesh, why perpetuate an error?