Another evasive response. In other words, you can’t point to a single thing in my reply that was false. Hint: simply saying that it’s false doesn’t make it so.
Perhaps you would care to explain how a prosecutor’s charging decision and/or pre-charging investigation would be grounds for appeal?
>> Hint: simply saying that it’s false doesn’t make it so.
Hint: simply asserting that it’s TRUE doesn’t make it so.
You offered zero evidence. Just (as usual) your lame, but oh-so-authoritarian, assertion.
Pony up case law if you wish to be believed. Chapter and verse.
MARYLAND case law.