Posted on 04/22/2015 9:57:22 AM PDT by marktwain
That's the modern police philosophy. Kill 'em all, and let God sort 'em out.
Here is another what I would call a good shooting:
Roderick Scott went out of his house to confront a trio of punks breaking into cars in his Greece, New York neighborhood. Scotts story was that he fired two rounds at one of them when the young man charged him after being told to freeze and wait for the cops
But if he is younger, stronger and obviously someone I couldn't dissuade with aforementioned tactics, I am well within my rights to stop him with an equalizer even if he doesn't hit me first.
CC
Apparently the cops and prosecutor in Princeton WV think you do. Given what was reported in the news about this it never should have gone to trial. Once again the process is the punishment.
Re: “Fisticuffs Justify Deadly Force”
Completely agree.
Murder by weapon type:
Shotguns - about 400 per year
Rifles - about 400 per year
Hands, Fists, and Feet - about 800 per year
[[If a scrawny little runt 6” shorter and 130# lighter than me is threatening to beat me to a pulp and comes at me, I am obligated to first trying to step aside]]
How would you know that that person isn’t a flyweight MMA fighter? ‘skinny and scrawny’ is meaningless- you said ‘in context’ so ‘skinny and scrawny’ ‘could be’ the person’s natural physique and also aggravated due to intensive training and weight loss-
[[As I was taught in my law enforcement “use of force” classes any blow to the head is deadly force and may be met with a commensurate response.]]
By anyone I might add- skinny or not- skinny scrawny people on angel dust can do tremendous deadly damage
Angel dust, meth, cocaine. But my experience is that adrenaline is the most deadly drug in use of force situations. In addition to it making the suspects subduing very difficult the officers own adrenaline can derange their thought processes and action. The only cure for it on the officers part is training and self discipline.
In most cases, self defense and deadly force are justified when the attacker shows:
- ability to injure or harm
- intent to assault
Don’t be so quick to assume. I saw a really short and skinny martial artist take a 6’2” American bruiser down to his knees with just minimum force, in about a second.
Imagine standing in front of someone, then reaching out to grab their collarbones. There is a nerve center right behind them. I asked the bruiser later what it was like, and he said “I was standing, and then suddenly I was on my knees.”
If they are within 5 feet of you, you could be at imminent risk.
But let's face it, there are a lot of runts who are all mouth and no pop. I know because I used to be one. Lucky for me, I had a gentle big brother who was built like and as protective as a mama grizzly bear at the time.
Wow. What's that make you 120 or 30?
But you never know. Just a day or two ago, I found a video taken by a police body cam. The cop had and used his Taser at point blank, on a skinny little rat, but still got a bad knife cut on his vest. Really grateful he was wearing one.
But I thought it was a superb example for anyone who carries a gun. Closing distance really matters.
http://www.wfmynews2.com/story/news/2015/04/21/body-cam-man-attacks-deputy/26110319/
I saw a 145 lb Golden Gloves champ dissuade a 245 pound bouncer who had decided to “kick his ass”. The boxer did it with 4 punches delivered in less than ten seconds.
Officer Wilson would've been hung out to dry had Michael Brown been a 150# runt who never made contact with him and hadn't been captured on video robbing a store just minutes before.
Scott Walker knockdown punch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=22&v=cryMRVDwItM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.