My question about your post 34 was a sincere question. Will you please answer it?
Why should I engage with someone who has publicly - for all here to see - proven himself an absolute @$$h01e in post 35 with zero provocation on my part. Your “sincerity” is laughable.
If you somehow divined provocation in post 34, perhaps your (delusional, drunk, high, whatever) state you’re in should be declared so we can take that into account.
You get one more chance to prove your sincerity and amend your unprovoked insult. If I don’t respond to your reply to this, then you are still an unreformed, self-demonstrated @$$h01e. That’s on you; not me. Are we clear?