I’m not sure if your post was banging me or not. I put up that idea strictly as a possible, (and I just saw a def. Att. on FOX bring up the exact same possible as I posted last night so maybe my ‘strawman’ wasn’t to far out of bounds huh?), NOT as what I think happened. Maybe I didn’t explain what I meant correctly, (the old brain isn’t working to good lately), or maybe I did not grasp your post’s meaning properly, because I think this cop flat out executed this guy. I can see no justifiable use of deadly force here. Anyone who has studied/trained in the ‘when you can’/when you can’t’ shoot procedures would see that. This perp is waddling away at far less than warp speed and this young’n kid cop couldn’t even attempt foot pursuit to bring him under some sort of control? Damn! I’m so sick of this trigger happy crap by these cops. I see a fair trial, a sentence, and a LONG time in the can for this cop.
You know what? I don’t know either. Let’s just call it an agreement, if this is what you think. I have just recently ended chemo (this week) and still have what’s called “chemobrain” It’s hard for me to hold on to a thought and/or a conversation!
I don’t even have the energy yet to go back and look it all up again. We can argue next time, twice, to make up for it. Ok? (grin)