Post 46 shows a crime taking place, murder.
If all I saw was ten seconds of a film of an angry B-17 bombardier pressing the button to hit Berlin, with no context about why he is in the plane or why the plane is there, I might see him as a cold blooded murderer. but then I find out that his pilot was just killed by an ME-109 and his wife was killed in a bombing in London - and the two countries are at war in which the place his just released his bombs on is the aggressor.
My point is, the video, in the right context, could vindicate the cop. Frankly, I don’t think it will, but I tend to agree with the author of the article. Involuntary manslaughter.
BTW, this video demonstrates why I think only fools aspire to become cops in our current culture. If I was one I’d be looking to get some training in C# and MVC.
No, you can pretend if you want, but the shooting cannot be explained or justified.
The shooter had two days where is was all his story, his facts, his description and everything was fine, and then this video showed up, and the cops watched it and charged him with murder.
I argued voluntary, not involuntary.
” but then I find out that his pilot was just killed by an ME-109 and his wife was killed in a bombing in London - and the two countries are at war in which the place his just released his bombs on is the aggressor.”
I can help you out on some of this.
Nobody involved had just been killed or even shot at by an ME-109, the cops wife is I believe pregnant so I’ll take that to mean she’s still alive, I don’t know if she was in London or not, and there are no warring countries involved.
Good lord that was the most tortured excuse I’ve seen on FR about this yet and there have been some doozies lol.