I have held the rocks and bones in my hand. Evolution is real and a fact. To argue this is ridiculous. I do believe this as I have seen and held the facts in my hands.
However, the concept of a universe that was created from nothing some billions of years ago is totally illogical. Thus as a scientist the concept of the biblical explanation for man and the universe is equally valid as one of the universe being all from nothing.
The scientist in me says the biblical explanation is not valid. The scientist in me also recognizes that either explanation is equally valid as both are totally scientifically invalid.
The problem with evolution is that what we are seeing, is it as a result of an evolution or something else? Where is the mathematical formula to which all these datas integrate into? Can the world we see be reproduced by deriving that formula?
I know a mathematician who is working on it, but with great difficulty. But he has found two problems:
1. probability makes an evolution improbable.
2. entropy means that evolution should worsen the species, not evolve them in positive ditections
There are instances of using chaos against chaos, such as when the body produces billions of different types of antibodies in random fashion during an infection. In effect, this is a live form of adaptation against a bug.
However, my friend has said that we can only rely on chaos theory, meaning we do not need to study the details of the process, just a global chaotic differential equation with strange attractor. To this day we still cannot predict whether the solar system is stable or not, let alone can we count on evolution for being a stable process leading to stability of life, or ever finding out for sure if it is indeed stable and inherent or not.
Last but not least is quantum mechanics. This is not even physics as we know it classically. It pretty much is a completely different topic of science in and of itself, a different world altogether. Evolution, or should I say, “SCIENCE”, relies on the laws of classical physics with determined particulate like particles, and not wave particles.
Real objects only exist when each electron’s state is chosen and determined. Other than that an electron, free, in its quantumic world, so to speak, has multiple states. The classical physics world is an opinion, like a sculpture that is frozen in space time, a flash image, that has a chosen a precise state for various electrons into their “ useful” material “purpose”.
In other words, if there is a path of evolution, that path, that equation, has been chosen, and it is real. So why not another one? Of course why not.
“I have degrees in science, geology and pharmacy and know a hell of a lot about chemistry.”
If one wants to call a contemporary Pharmacy degree science. (Just kidding) (or am I?).
“Evolution is real and a fact. “
That’s dogma. Definitely not scientific.
“I have held the rocks and bones in my hand. Evolution is real and a fact. “
What if someone else held the same bones in their hand and pronounced, “evolution is not fact!”.
You say silly things.