Tom Coburn sounded like one of the good guys when he first went into the House and then the Senate.
My problem is that when Obamacare became law Coburn’s response was to advocate for a more market friendly version of Obamacare, for amending Obamacare not eliminating it.
Coburn wanted Romneycare, in other words.
“Heath Care Reform” was needed to pump more cash into an ailing industry by making everyone buy private medical insurance in a government regulated market. The alternative is taxation to pay for Medicaid for the poor which is expanded under Obamacare administered by private insurance companies again.
OBAMACARE LIKE ROMNEYCARE IS A BAILOUT FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES AND BIG HOSPITAL GROUPS, THE PHARMA INDUSTRY ETC.
You have to wonder about people like Coburn.
Will an A 5 convention reverse Amnesty, Obamacare, Common Core or even Gay Marriage or is it just a diversion to keep us from forming a third political party?????
This soft language is what I'm concerned about. No facts on how they mean to justify
this convention without giving us the point of it.
Maybe somebody will clarify this, but if the casual Freeper like myself
doesn't know, I can only imagine how much in the dark Americans are.
I think we're being sold down the road on this. By now we should all know
what is being planned, and their case laid out perfectly. This is not the case.
They're not worried about a third party, if anything they're worried about
True Patriotic Americans taking back the GOP. The last election was the shot
across the bow, imo. And they got the message but they're fighting back.
“You have to wonder about people like Coburn.”
EXACTLY. Coburn was the leading Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee which refused to vet Obama, but made McCain jump through hoops. He has never explained nor apologized. BTW Hillary and Obama were on that same committee. Obama was even allowed to write the part about others once thought ineligible were actually eligible—a big lie. COBURN CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
An A5 Convention will circumvent the need for another party by limiting the scope of federal power.
If it did nothing but strictly redefine the Commerce Clause, it would be worth the effort.