Skip to comments.
Modular Thorium Reactor - ThorCon MSR
itheo.org ^
| 12 January, 2015
Posted on 02/22/2015 7:30:43 AM PST by ckilmer
Modular Thorium Reactor - ThorCon MSR
Martingale reveals a bold approach to solving the global issues of poverty, pollution, energy security, and climate. Today Martingale is announcing its ThorCon liquid-fuel nuclear reactor design for cheap, reliable, CO2-free electricity.
ThorCon is a complete system of power generation modules, interchange maintenance, and liquid fuel service that produces energy cheaper than coal. Principal engineer Jack Devanney led a four-year “skunkworks” project that has created a new kind of nuclear power plant, integrating proven technologies with breakthrough approaches to manufacturing and licensing. Production can start by 2020.
Former MIT professor Devanney’s background in shipbuilding created respect for low-cost, high-precision, block-unit manufacturing at Korean shipyards. He saw how such prefabricated blocks could enable production of enough nuclear power plants to make a global difference, a hundred a year.
Author Robert Hargraves writes that selling so many power plants requires clear, simple economics, cheaper than coal. Coal is today’s energy choice of developing nations, now planning to build over 1400 gigawatt-size coal power plants to enable their economic development.
Hargraves says “Yes, at 3 cents/kWh the ThorCon electricity will be cheaper than gas. But for most of the world coal will be the fuel of choice for electric generation, unless we can provide a cheaper alternative.”
Lawrence Livermore Lab veteran nuclear scientist Ralph Moir says that today’s nuclear power industry is wedded to expensive solid-fuel nuclear reactors, even though the simplicity of liquid fuels was demonstrated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Moir and Devanney modernized that design for mass production. ThorCon uses uranium and thorium fuel dissolved in molten salt to create a power plant that makes electricity cheaper than coal.
Stanford engineering alums Chris Uhlik and Lars Jorgensen contributed to the design of passive safety functions that operate without mechanical or electronic controls, even with no power. The reactor is 30 meters underground. Overheating drains the fuel salt from the reactor. There are four barriers between the fuel salt and the atmosphere. ThorCon is walk-away safe.
Taking another lesson from Oak Ridge, Martingale advocates a return to staged testing of physical prototypes for new nuclear reactor designs. This made the US the world standard for nuclear designs in the 1960s. Martingale supports adoption of the same license-by-test model that has enabled US leadership in aviation and drug discovery.
Martingale is designing ThorCon in the US while targeting its first installations in forward-looking countries that support technology-neutral nuclear regulations and see the benefits of the license-by-test process. ThorCon opens up a practically limitless supply of low-cost, reliable, carbon-free power by 2020.
ThorCon Power
Last updated 12 January, 2015
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; martingale; thorcon; thoriumreactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
02/22/2015 7:30:43 AM PST
by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer
at 3 cents/kWh the ThorCon electricity will be cheaper than gas.
.................
That’s 1/2-1/3 the cost of cheapest coal or natural gas.
2
posted on
02/22/2015 7:31:47 AM PST
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: ckilmer
The rate here in the South is 11 cents/KWH.
3
posted on
02/22/2015 7:36:59 AM PST
by
Dick Bachert
(This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
To: ckilmer
The rate here in the South is 11 cents/KWH.
4
posted on
02/22/2015 7:37:17 AM PST
by
Dick Bachert
(This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
To: ckilmer
5
posted on
02/22/2015 7:37:31 AM PST
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: ckilmer
This tech has great potential. Keep the government the hell away from it.
6
posted on
02/22/2015 7:37:58 AM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: Dick Bachert; ckilmer
Don’t confuse the electricity cost with the added cost of transport.
My current Kwh cost (at this moment - 10 AM) is 3.1 cents.
http://www.powersmartpricing.org/prices/
My transportation cost is separate.
7
posted on
02/22/2015 7:42:34 AM PST
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: ckilmer
Thorium reactors are a GREAT concept, but the problem is, the environazis and liberals, who are immune to logic, business acumen, common sense, and, ironically enough, REAL environmentalism, will fight them every single inch of the way.
Just because the word “reactor” is in the description and the key ingredient ends with “ium”.
Emotionalism trumps all for them, and they have power now.
What will likely happen is the Chinese or the Russians will make huge strides in them and deploy them, and we will buy from them out of shame.
8
posted on
02/22/2015 7:42:41 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
To: ckilmer
The only reason coal is so expensive is due to excessive government regulation.
9
posted on
02/22/2015 7:44:52 AM PST
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: ckilmer
In fact, we probably could have had this 30 years ago if not for DOE’s politically-driven meddling. And that bitch Jane Fonda and her stupid movie...
10
posted on
02/22/2015 7:45:44 AM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: ckilmer
at 3 cents/kWh the ThorCon electricity will be cheaper than gas.Don't worry. Government safety oversight will help move that cost to a more reasonable $6/KWhr, no problem.
11
posted on
02/22/2015 7:52:49 AM PST
by
lafroste
To: rlmorel
Yep, you’re right on the money; “reactor” and “ium” and hang another shingle around their neck worded “hysterical”, in addition to the hat and t-shirt worded “wind” and “solar”.
12
posted on
02/22/2015 7:55:09 AM PST
by
Patriot777
(Imagine....that we could see Obama being hauled out of the White House kicking and screaming?)
To: ckilmer
Taking another lesson from Oak Ridge
13
posted on
02/22/2015 7:57:49 AM PST
by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
To: Patriot777
Hmmm...
windium....
solarium....
You're right.
14
posted on
02/22/2015 7:58:53 AM PST
by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
To: ConservativeMind
There are plans for “neighborhood sized” plants that you bury in the ground and forget them, until you dig it up to refuel. The neighborhood can have their own wiring, in that case. No “transportation costs” needed ... :-) ...
15
posted on
02/22/2015 8:05:43 AM PST
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Star Traveler
The transport costs are the infrastructure costs (electricity lines, poles, etc.), which include labor for maintenance. The cost of electricity on the spot market is effectively what those prices at my link above are (but I pay a small fee ($2.50/month) for “day ahead” pricing, which is kept profit neutral, because I don’t want to be predicting the costs myself, everyday). There is probably a small fee for line loss, depending on how far away the electricity is that bought this way.
16
posted on
02/22/2015 8:29:25 AM PST
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: rlmorel
Another company called Flibe is said to be working around the current regulatory restraints by designing thorium reactors for US military bases for which no regulator restraints apply.
The US DOE is currently funding a Canadian thorium reactor company which also is not under current US regulatory constraints.
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC doesn’t have any rules yet that apply to the molton salt designs. All of their regulations were designed for light water reactors.
I think there will be some movement in this area in the next couple years.
Whether its fast enough to get the 4-5 US companies involved in 4th generation msr tech into first place in the molten salt reactor race remains to be seen.
17
posted on
02/22/2015 8:33:34 AM PST
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: bigbob
In fact, we probably could have had this 30 years ago if not for DOEs politically-driven meddling. And that bitch Jane Fonda and her stupid movie...
..................
There were a bunch of really bad mistakes that were made in the 1970’s.
The abandonment of thorium reactors was one. The abandonment of desalination membrane research was another. The FDA drive to lower fat in the American diet in favor of sugar was a third.
18
posted on
02/22/2015 8:37:09 AM PST
by
ckilmer
(q)
To: rlmorel
Which is why those countries will continue to grow and we will watch their standards of living go up and ours stagnate or even decrease slightly.
To: ckilmer
Martingale is designing ThorCon in the US while targeting its first installations in forward-looking countries that support technology-neutral nuclear regulations and see the benefits of the license-by-test process.
...
More than likely, Martingale is looking for non-thinking suckers to give them money.
20
posted on
02/22/2015 8:40:36 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson