IMVHO, not a good ideA. What Rudy is saying about Obama has long needed to be said by a national figure, but it is not the battle we have to fight.
We agree with Rudy, but he is highlighting yesterday's problem. That's good. But, Obama is yesterday. It is like yelling at a wayward child. Righteous anger is just the beginning of the solution.
Where the yelling might do some good is at the other wayward child in the room, the spoiled rich kids of the GOPe who are just as guilty of the destruction of the Republic because it couldn't happen without their enabling help.
The Republicans hold a majority in BOTH Houses of Congress, and 30 state houses and governorships. Why aren't they as angry as Rudy?
Obama is not the candidate. He is the President until 2016. Our anger has to be directed at OUR representatives, where we have the ability to make a change. Instead of controlling Obama, our Congress seems poised to sell us down the river. Imagine the results if one (1) "Congressional Voice" had just said what Giuliani said! That this righteous anger is missing in the Republican Party is hardly Obama's fault. He is behaving in accordance with his Marxist beliefs. Unfortunately, the other party, ostensibly our party, is NOT behaving in accordance with OUR beliefs, which they told us they shared! Against Obama and the Democrat Party, what do we have to offer? Anger is not enough.
Please focus, my people.
And there's your problem: it's the "Republicans", and not the "Conservatives".
As long as that maintains, the Uniparty is in power, and the course of the ship of state is headed straight for the reef.
"The Republicans hold a majority in BOTH Houses of Congress, and 30 state houses and governorships. Why aren't they as angry as Rudy?"
It is fitting that you used a metaphor that refer to black slaves.