Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Berlin_Freeper

The Nazis, much like the Soviets, were cunning and evil; however, the bombing missions that morphed into the fire-bombing of Dresden weren’t originated by the Luftwaffe. The destruction of a city and most of its civilian population was an inhumane act.

At the onset Germany bombed military targets exclusively as Hitler specifically prohibited the Luftwaffe from bombing any civilian targets.

In August of 1940, two aircraft were seperated from their formation and wound up lost while evading fighters over England. They jettisoned a negligible amount of bombs over London resulting in little damage.

Churchill directed the RAF to begin bombing raids over Berlin four times in a row. After the fourth raid, Germany warned the UK not to bomb Berlin for the fifth time or they would be forced to retaliate.

So Churchill ordered the fifth bombing and the Luftwaffe began the blitz.


25 posted on 02/15/2015 5:19:40 AM PST by HomerBohn (God is just, but his justice cannot sleep forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HomerBohn
At the onset Germany bombed military targets exclusively as Hitler specifically prohibited the Luftwaffe from bombing any civilian targets.

Was that Hitler's sense of altruism and fair play, or a strategic unwillingness to waste assets?

33 posted on 02/15/2015 5:31:01 AM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn
So prior bombing missions related to cities were OK? When did they become inhumane?

In August of 1940, two aircraft were seperated from their formation and wound up lost while evading fighters over England. They jettisoned a negligible amount of bombs over London resulting in little damage.

Did you write for the Reich? What is a negligible amount of bombs when you are a civvie on the ground? What is your source for this statement as I assume you weren't the flight leader?

43 posted on 02/15/2015 5:55:01 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn
"At the onset Germany bombed military targets exclusively as Hitler specifically prohibited the Luftwaffe from bombing any civilian targets."

Tell that to the Spanish in Guernica.

52 posted on 02/15/2015 6:23:17 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

The Luftwaffe were the first to use incendiary bombs when they hit Coventry...

Being in the RAF and bombing the crap out of Nazis during World War II was not an easy job mate, from Wikipedia...

Bomber Command crews also suffered an extremely high casualty rate: 55,573 killed out of a total of 125,000 aircrew (a 44.4% death rate), a further 8,403 were wounded in action and 9,838 became prisoners of war.


64 posted on 02/15/2015 6:49:41 AM PST by Geronimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

The British bombing became less selective after the Rotterdam blitz in May of ‘40. That had already been proceeded by the indiscriminate bombing during the Polish invasion.


82 posted on 02/15/2015 7:58:40 AM PST by KC Burke (I know my screen name says KC but I'm in AZ now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

“...In August of 1940, two [Luftwaffe] aircraft ... jettisoned a negligible amount of bombs over London ...

So Churchill ordered the fifth bombing and the Luftwaffe began the blitz.”

HomerBohn and ilk must revel in their self-bestowed sense of moral superiority. How precious, that they bolster such by second-guessing the decisions and actions taken in the midst of a serious war, now three generations behind us.

Their stance is that much more odious: the people they are poormouthing are nearly all dead. Some did die, or endure great suffering and sacrifice, to afford modern critics safety, comfort, and leisure - to make invidious moral comparisons.

In any war, one can be moral, or be effective. To choose the first is to negate the second. Imbecilic; not all that moral either, at the end of the day.


99 posted on 02/15/2015 12:24:32 PM PST by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

When exactly did Hitler give that warning to Poland?


107 posted on 02/15/2015 1:43:27 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson