Replies

I forget that some freepers equate water and meth as equally dangerous.

I remember that YOU are among a handful of FReepers who equate erroneous conclusions with facts.

If you pulled that stunt on a witness stand, the judge would eventually cite you with contempt of court, and rightly. Here, you only show your contempt for truth and honesty.

Folks HERE accurately cite you with HYPOCRISY. Since you are against drugs, if you really meant it, you would be has hot against alcohol as you are against pot, since it is PROVEN to be every bit as destructive and dangerous.

When you have to bear false witness to win an argument -- which you DO, as your posts here illustrate -- then you are clearly on the wrong side. You add hypocrisy to the list by refusing to hold alcohol in EXACTLY the same contempt as you do marijuana.

If I was like you, I'd be accusing you of supporting and advocating alcoholism. But I'd be lying, just as YOU ARE LYING when you say "some freepers equate water and meth as equally dangerous."

In truth, some FReepers WILL LIE TO 'WIN' AN ARGUMENT. You, Dio, and Geron L are among them.

manc, you are included among the liars I mention in my post 276.

Like I say, had you lived 150 years ago, you'd probably have had a short life because a righteous man would have shot you in a duel for insulting his honor, and that's what you do a vast number of honest, right, God-fearing compatriots in your supreme and pig-headed arrogance.

You are a pig when you tell righteous people that they "want" to legalize incest, pornography, and all manner of evils and ills, JUST because they refuse to advocate using the force of government to be others' moral guardians the way that YOU presume to.

You are a liar and you should have your ass kicked hard and square.

I remember that YOU are among a handful of FReepers who equate erroneous conclusions with facts.

No you don't. You only *THINK* you do because you haven't kept up with the discussion. I repeatedly explain that I don't believe there is a coorelation between marijuana usage and mass murderers/serial killers, and that I am only posting those examples because I know it pisses off those people pushing drugs while screeching "FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!"

You just come into the conversation having missed my explanation as to why I keep pointing out the mass murderers who smoke pot, and you JUMP TO THE CONCLUSION that I am arguing a causal effect.

And then you compound your error by making "False Witness" accusations.

I believe that about sums it up.