Posted on 02/02/2015 12:20:53 PM PST by Starman417
No one noticed. But I did.
Back in 2008 Barack Obama said
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cqN4NIEtOY
Then when confronted Obama denied it:
O’Reilly: OK. I got a letter from Kathy LaMaster, Fresno, Calif. I said I would read one letter from the folks, all right?Obama: All right.
O’Reilly: "Mr. President, why do you feel it's necessary to fundamentally transform the nation that has afforded you so much opportunity and success?"
Obama: I don't think we have to fundamentally transform the nation.
Yes, you do, you liar.
The Obama worshipping minions of Politifact couldn't figure out what Obama meant by "fundamentally transform" the US.
We decided that we couldn’t put this statement to the Truth-O-Meter, since the definition of "fundamentally transform" is too vague.
So let's help.
2. of, relating to, or affecting the foundation or basis: "a fundamental revision."
1. to change in form, appearance, or structure; metamorphose.2. to change in condition, nature, or character; convert.
3. to change into another substance; transmute.
By definition what Obama said was that he wanted to change the foundation of the country. This country is fundamentally a democratic republic and that is what Obama wants to change. The Obama sycophants at Politifact are so heavily burdened with bias that they were unwilling to be honest.
Let's now jump ahead to Obama's SOTU 2015:
Fifteen years into this new century, we have picked ourselves up, dusted ourselves off and begun again the work of remaking America.
There it was again. When he was sure everyone stopped paying attention he let it fly.
1. to make again or anew.
He said we needed to fundamentally transform America, then denied it, then said again that we need to do "remake" America.
For the life of me I cannot understand why anyone believes anything that liar says. One cannot ever forget that Obama was steeped in Alinskyism:
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
No, I didn’t miss it.
It did, however, surprise me. Communism has been a failure where ever it has been tried. Besides, it leaves behind real depression; economically and emotionally. Why someone wants to create such a horrid regime is a puzzlement. It only empowers a few and not the many.
I’ve told this to everyone who would listen to me about it, including my in-laws. Why does America need to be fundamentally changed? Are we so horrible, have done things so wrong as a nation that we must be destroyed and rebuilt?
NO, NO, and NO!
"It only empowers a few and not the many".
bookmark
That’s the great irony of Communism/Marxist-Leninism: it tears down one aristocracy to replace it with another.
Meet the new boss: same as the other boss.
I’m not acquisitive. Money. wealth,...doesn’t move me. But recognizing how well others do, and seeing the widespread success of others, does provide me with satisfaction.
Meet the new boss: same as the other boss.
Can you say,"AGENDA 21?"
Why someone wants to create such a horrid regime is a puzzlement. It only empowers a few and not the many.
Because liberals are mental who keep trying the same politics hoping for a different result. And the liberals think they are going to be the empowered few - HA! IMHO
I did not miss it.
Good for you, and I mean that sincerely, but not everyone feels the same way. For some the only thing that matters is power. Money is nice, but absolute rule of a country with a large powerful army and an arsenal of nuclear weapons...that is where it’s really at.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.