DEAGLE I CAN SEE THAT YOU HAVE YOUR MIND MADE UP AND IT IS NOT TO BE CHANGED. I WILL ADMIT THAT AS SOON AS WE DO GET TO POLICE FOR MONEY SOMEONE WILL BE COMING AFTER YOU. I ONLY WISH I GOT PART OF THE REVENUE I GENERATE A YEAR, THEN I WOULDN’T BE UNDER PAID AND BROKE AS I AM.
YOU NEED TO REALIZE THAT YOU ARE DREAMING IF YOU THINK WE GET OVER ZEALOUS AND RUN OURSELF SILLY BECAUSE WE GET A CUT OF WHAT IS TAKEN IN BY THE GOVERNMENT. IF IT DID WORK THAT WAY I COULD SEE YOUR POINT. BUT NO PAYOLA IS GOING ON. NEXT DON’T SPEED AND BE NICE AND DON’T WORRY, PLAY LIKE A GANSTA AND I’M AFRAID YOU MAY JUST GET BUSTED.
Are you making a threat of physical violence to Deagle? You could be considered as engaging in criminal mischief. If the State Attorney General is not willing to prosecute you for your obvious breach of the peace, let's see how you look in front of a jury at a civil trial.
The modern police force was created by Sir Robert Peel approximately around 1830 in London. The violence and abuses suffered from the current crop of officers may lead the citizens of the USA to consider a complete overhaul. We don't want our women manhandled or our babies blown up by flash bang grenades. Let's see how public safety was looked after before Sir Robert Peel. Your tirade makes it clear that it past time for a civil change.
Are you making a threat of physical violence to Deagle? You could be considered as engaging in criminal mischief.
Further to your verbal threats and violence you should be informed of one more, very significant, thing. While the State legislatures, Attorneys General and District Attorneys may make it clear to you that almost any criminal act on your part will not be prosecuted, there is a line drawn. If you, or your ilk, commit a FELONY crime against any citizen(s), all oaths of loyalty and homage between said citizen(s) and State are broken by your action. The Western Christian tradition and laws make clear that the citizen(s) who've suffered have the right even to go to war against the oppressive Ruler who permits this. It would be a just war.
Under current conditions you may be wise to be more circumspect in your behavior. Deus vult.
Following a suspicious vehicle, Sergeant Matt Darisse noticed that onlyone of the vehicle’s brake lights was working and pulled the driver over. While issuing a warning ticket for the broken brake light, Darisse became suspicious of the actions of the two occupants and their answers to his questions. Petitioner Nicholas Brady Heien, the car’sowner, gave Darisse consent to search the vehicle. Darisse found cocaine, and Heien was arrested and charged with attempted trafficking. The trial court denied Heien’s motion to suppress the seized evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds, concluding that the vehicle’sfaulty brake light gave Darisse reasonable suspicion to initiate the stop. The North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the relevant code provision, which requires that a car be “equipped witha stop lamp,” N. C. Gen. Stat. Ann. §20–129(g), requires only a single lamp—which Heien’s vehicle had—and therefore the justification forthe stop was objectively unreasonable. Reversing in turn, the State Supreme Court held that, even assuming no violation of the state law had occurred, Darisse’s mistaken understanding of the law was reasonable, and thus the stop was valid. Held: Because Darisse’s mistake of law was reasonable, there was reasonable suspicion justifying the stop under the Fourth Amendment.
The headline misleads.
I WILL ADMIT THAT AS SOON AS WE DO GET TO POLICE FOR MONEY SOMEONE WILL BE COMING AFTER YOU. I ONLY WISH I GOT PART OF THE REVENUE I GENERATE A YEAR, THEN I WOULDN’T BE UNDER PAID AND BROKE AS I AM.
***************************
Get over yourself ,, you have a simple public servant job and great pay compared to anyone else with the same level of schooling and experience.
As to your contention that you don’t get a cut of the revenues that’s complete hogwash ... In Florida the police get a percentage added to their retirement based on an auto insurance pool that pays out when a zip codes enforcement goes up ... cops are paid by insurers to trash peoples license points and create higher rates... http://www.floridaleagueofcities.com/Assets/Files/LeeVonasekPensionPaper.pdf
Add to that that the numbers of police relative to the crime rate is extremely high and the only conclusion you can logically draw is that the “war on drugs” and civil forfeiture is extremely lucrative... even if you don’t get extra pay it supports the salary of very high numbers of cops ,, far more than would be otherwise necessary...
You and I both know that it is all about politics! Those in charge (your supervisors) have to meet standards and that includes money intake! It has always been so but lately has become the major effort. I know that you realize this as you have been part of their briefings..so quit trying to downsize the problem. It occurs in all places, small and large towns. Money collected by the police department is watched closely.
It use to be that they just asked you to pursue the lawbreakers, but these days, it is to meet a quota. Tell me that is not happening! Look at the Camera installations and the problems that they cause with rear-enders. Safety is not the primary objective here. If you still believe that than you are a good but naive policeman.
Most still rebel but the push politically by the top causes these problems. So, stop responding with all CAPS and we just might begin to believe you...