Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/01/2014 3:42:48 AM PST by lifeofgrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lifeofgrace

Not for nothing, the problem isn’t the new black panthers or the KKK it’s average black criminals who commit murder and mayhem on a daily basis, which is generally ignored; and the “leaders” of the black community who want the world to stop every time some random black guy has the ill luck to be killed by a non-black guy.

It’s BS and everyone is sick of it. Everyone except the pundit class and the aforementioned “leaders”.


2 posted on 12/01/2014 3:54:50 AM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace
Did this author really invoke the thoroughly discredited Alien and Sedition Acts to justify censorship of modern political speech?


3 posted on 12/01/2014 3:59:52 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace

The burning cross and the lynching tree are all too real for some who cling to slights, perceived or real. Usually perceived.


6 posted on 12/01/2014 4:21:48 AM PST by Shimmer1 (No punishment is too great for the man who builds his greatness upon his country's ruin.G.Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace

I thought RICO was already used in the 80s or 90s to strip the Klan of their money.

The Democrats post civil war “insurgents” (KKK) don’t command any influence these days. Their political power and violence lasted roughly 100 years but today?


9 posted on 12/01/2014 4:35:10 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace
Congress has the authority to act, and the President to sign, legislation to ban the KKK as a seditious group

If Congress thought Congress could do that it would ban the KKK but would not touch any Black organization at all. Th definition of Racism is too restrictive. It is too ingrained that only white people can be racist and that any suggestion that Negroes can be racist is racist. If the KKK were to be so banned the Westphal Baptist Church and then the John Birch Society would follow and then quickly hated conservative organizations and then those progressively less disdained by the Left. 60 years ago when this sort of thing was debated and demanded, the Communist Party would probably have been the sole organization so banned. The attachment to the Constitution is so tenuous now that once the breach is made on that front the trickle would quickly become a flood.

10 posted on 12/01/2014 4:35:39 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace

The number of white people lynched was small, around a thousand, according to the NAACP. Why were those whites lynched? They were trying to register Black Americans as Republicans.

That is the secret the media will not publicize - that the KKK was lynching white Republicans - and it had nothing to do with racism, but naked politics.


13 posted on 12/01/2014 4:45:19 AM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace

I’m calling Bee Ess on this article.

I refuse to accept imparted guilt just because of my skin color or ethnicity.


15 posted on 12/01/2014 4:55:21 AM PST by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace

To the author from our Watch What You Wish For Dept.: Islam and the Communist party are TRUELY seditious groups.


16 posted on 12/01/2014 5:17:10 AM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lifeofgrace
Congress has the authority to act, and the President to sign, legislation to ban the KKK as a seditious group. . . it’s not more unconstitutional than what the EPA has already tried . . . Why should we allow public insults to exist, which further inflame and divide us, when we could show those who feel marginalized that we’re at least listening?

I strongly disagree. To the extent that the Klan is engaged in a conspiracy to commit criminal acts, their conduct is already illegal. To the extent that they are merely engaged in ignorant speech, their speech is and ought to be protected under the First Amendment. Once the federal government steps into the position of regulating the content of speech, that regulation will grow to an oppressive level.

The "it's not more unconstitutional than . . ." argument illustrates the fundamental flaw in your case. Obamacare's abortion mandate is an unconstitutional violation of a fundamental God-given human right. Speech codes on campus are an unconstitutional violation of a fundamental God-given human right. Most existing gun laws are an unconstitutional violation of a fundamental God-given human right. The fact that the federal government is operating outside the strict limits imposed by the Constitution is not a justification for more violations of that founding document. The widespread violations of our constitutional rights are a justification for restraining the federal government and cutting it back to its proper scope of operations.

19 posted on 12/01/2014 9:07:58 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson