Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: therightliveswithus

Math anyone? It does no good to let them vote again. That just cancels the jote they just placed. They would need to vote twice for Roberts to cancel one Orman vote and end with a net positive vote for Roberts.

I checked my ballot very carefully. If it changed anything, it was after the last screen.


13 posted on 11/04/2014 2:19:39 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

That’s what I wondered as I read this. Voting once means nothing if the misvote is not taken from the total. If not, the voter may as well have stayed home! SMH.


25 posted on 11/04/2014 2:27:31 PM PST by W. (The dems switched election map colors because the blue top peanut butter has all the nuts in it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

You’re exactly right, and this may be why we’re seeing so much of this. It’s a cleverly subtle way of rigging the election. It becomes a win-win for the Democrats. If a bogus vote isn’t noticed, that’s one more for the Dem. If it does get noticed, merely letting the voter re-vote once does nothing more than cancel out the extra Dem vote without adding one to the Republican for which it was intended, thereby making it as if the voter didn’t even show up. I’m assuming that they’re not letting them re-vote twice to make up for the “error,” so this is election theft in plain sight.


58 posted on 11/04/2014 2:47:28 PM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson