Taking what from whom?
Bundy does not own the land he grazes his cattle on. Bundy entered into a lease with the BLM to graze his cattle on their (government) land. Bundy paid for that lease for several years. When he did not renew his lease, he no longer had the right to graze or use the government land.
I might be confusing you with another FReeper, but my impression is that you believe the government can not be lying in the case and the Bundys can not be telling the truth.
Not gonna play those games.
Did the BLM cancel the Bundy grazing rights lease under false pretenses, namely that they were protecting a tortoise that was never endangered, and was, in fact, doing better under the grazing program than under the federal do nothing program?