Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sakic

Yep.

That’s were the weapons from Libya were going.

Hillary had it planned to blame Romney and the republicans for Benghazi.

It was supposed to be another “October Surprise” that the republicans had collaborated with the terrorist to attack and make Obama look like Peanuts Carter.

She would then blame the republicans collaborating with terrorist for the terrorist getting the weapons.

Hillary had planned on Romney being president and ISIS attacking Iraq would be his fault and his problem to deal with.

Hillary could claim Romney had gotten us into another war in Iraq.

Contrary to what you’ve been led to believe, the IRS didn’t target the TEA Party to get Zippo reelected.

The IRS targeting the TEA Party was Hillary’s operation and it was part of a plan to “criminalize” any political opposition to Hillary’s agenda.

The IRS was being used by Holders DoJ to get the names of people that had political differences.

They wanted the names of anyone associated with the TEA Party because they intended to have the TEA Party declared a terrorist organization with the car bombing of NYC which they tried to blame on the TEA Party.

Before that attempted bombing in 2010 the dems started a campaign claiming the TEA Party were a bunch of ultra violent, right wing extremist, racist Tim McVeigh wannabes.

After the attempted bombing Bloomberg said because it was a fertilizer bomb like McVeigh used it had to be the TEA Party.

The bomb matched the dems talking points, which is where the “Spontaneous” lie came from.

It was an attempt to explain why the dems talking points and what was in the news before a terrorist attack matched the terrorist attack.

The idea was to make people believe the terrorist are so in tune with the news the terrorist are picking up on what is in the news and “spontaneously” planning attacks around what is in the news, NOT that the dems are orchestrating news for the attacks.

This is why the dems praised Peanuts Carter at their convention right before the attack in Benghazi, to get the comparison of Zippo with Peanuts Carter and to get the attack on an embassy in the news.

Hillary would make the claim the attack was “spontaneous” which no one above the level of idiot was supposed to believe.

Hillary’s minions would then make claims the repubs had collaborated with terrorist to make Zippo look like Peanuts Carter an “October Surprise II”.

Republicans would then come back and claim the terrorist had simply picked up on the dems praising Carter at their convention and planned the attack around what was in the news.

Simple strategy of a defense attorney and a follower of Saul Alinsky.

Accuse someone else of your crimes and get them to create your defense to the crime.

Once Zippo lost the election and the “October Surprise” nonsense had taken hold, Holder’s DoJ would then target the TEA Party for collaborating with terrorist.

The field was being cleared for Hillary.


37 posted on 10/27/2014 6:06:58 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: IMR 4350

Curious where all of this info comes from.


38 posted on 10/27/2014 9:17:17 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson