Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rusty0604

So, if they are not tested, then they will not officially have Ebola. Is that how we are going to stop more cases, by not testing for it, so that nobody else officially has Ebola????


2 posted on 10/21/2014 9:21:07 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Well I assume they are not testing till after the election


6 posted on 10/21/2014 9:25:34 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Obama Will Say 'War on Women' But Not 'War on ISIS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

My guess they had no fever. But I heard on Hannity that a good percentage of Ebola victims don’t always have a fever first.


9 posted on 10/21/2014 9:29:36 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“So, if they are not tested, then they will not officially have Ebola.”

If they test for it, they have to admit it.
There will be NO new announcements of Ebola until AFTER the election. The Dems know it was KILLING them in the polls.

And hey, what are a few Dead People to today’s Radical Dems, compared to holding power?


11 posted on 10/21/2014 9:38:20 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

ding ding ding

testing sick Liberians for ebola would be like profiling you know

rasist!


25 posted on 10/22/2014 4:39:08 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson