Now, I know that you would like for that to be insignificant until they actually get a volunteer and carry that out under laboratory conditions, but it isn't.
So, no - lack of experiments on humans does not reduce the risk factor to that of a rumor.
I guess that you could volunteer to be tested on with an infected dog, just so the issue would be settled in your mind. That would be an awful thing to do to your family though, as there really isn't much medical doubt.
A 9 year old study *hypothesizes* something, having no real empirical evidence to show for it, and you expect me to fly into hysteria?
Why don’t we all just go into Black Death mode, while we’re at it?
They blamed “witchcraft” and killed all the “cat familiars” they could find and the plague rats thanked them for it.
This place embarrasses me.
The MSM skin walkers start chanting some bit of sensationalistic, scientifically unproven “what if?” scenario and you all respond to the tugs on your strings like dutiful little marionettes.
Pitiful.
I used to think I’d be glad to have you “in my foxhole”, if it ever came to it.
Ha.
There’s no room in there for panicky nancies.
Funny how the very same people who claim that Ebola infected *humans* are just fine to sit down and have a beer with but their *dogs*?
OMG, no.
Shoot *them*.
You are being played.
I hope their laughter soon wakes you up.