Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Texas Judge Refuses to Wed Straight Couples
Washington Post ^ | 2/24/2012 | Elizabeth Flock

Posted on 10/01/2014 7:20:58 AM PDT by lbryce

Correction: This post initially stated that Judge Tonya Parker was “no longer” marrying straight couples. Judge Parker has never performed such marriage ceremonies. This version has been corrected.

Catholic priests have refused to marry same-sex couples for years.

Judge Tonya Parker (Dallas County) Now, a Texas judge has an answer to that, saying she will not marry straight couples until gay marriage is legal in the state.

Judge Tonya Parker of Dallas County told the Dallas Voice that she respectfully tells couples why she can’t conduct their marriage ceremony:

“I'm sorry. I don't perform marriage ceremonies because we are in a state that does not have marriage equality, and until it does, I am not going to partially apply the law to one group of people that doesn’t apply to another group of people.” The Lone Star state judge also points out that she is not required by law to perform marriages, as it was considered a “discretionary function” that is not to interfere with “mandatory judicial duties.”

Parker is the first openly lesbian African American elected official in the state of Texas, where same-sex marriage is illegal.

Earlier this week in San Antonio, a Presbyterian minister was censured for performing same-sex marriages in California while it was legal to do so, PressDemocrat.com reports. The Rev. Jane Spahr says she performed the marriages as a matter of conscience. After hearing the church’s decision, she tweeted:

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; activistjudge; cultureofcorruption; denialofservice; gayjudge; gaynewsrooms; homosexualagenda; judge; judicialactivism; marriageequality; refusalofservice; texas; waronmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Ransomed

What I stated was: “The individual States do define the prerequisites to the privileges...

You’re referring to what various “faiths” believe, not State laws. ...Some faiths believe polygamy is just fine, but that doesn’t mean that States will issue a license for such.

I think you and I are on different tracks on this topic. You seem to be talking religion while I’m referring to State laws.

It’s all ok. No harm either way.


41 posted on 10/01/2014 4:23:07 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: octex

No problems here either, FRiend.

Freegards


42 posted on 10/01/2014 4:29:26 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Why would she need to tell them? I assume a judge is assigned to a couple.


43 posted on 10/01/2014 8:04:31 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson