Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The article, as all such articles do, implies that Sherman and other Army officials were providing “reparations” to compensate ex-slaves for their oppression.

In actual fact, all the army provided was “possessory titles,” not absolute titles for permanent ownership.

IOW, they were intended as a temporary measure to settle the blacks in situations where they could support themselves rather than being parasites on the army. It was never intended to be a permanent measure, unless of course Congress so decided. The Army had no authority to make permanent disposition of title to land, espcially after the war ended.


5 posted on 09/11/2014 7:23:04 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins most of the battles. Reality wins ALL the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
I've been watching a period cop show from Italy, and I looked up Il Duce's escapades in Ethiopia "née" Abyssinia, and it turns out a series of rulers tried to declare slavery illegal, and Mussolini ran into the same problem as the rest in that the former slaves showed up, and essentially said, "You're feeding us now..."

Sherman was making the best of the rough situation.

During WWII, Eisenhower & Co. didn't want to liberate Paris at the time for the same reason, a drain on resources.

6 posted on 09/11/2014 7:58:10 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson