Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BwanaNdege

I think the “Imperial” marque was born out of the Chrysler - Packard merger.


14 posted on 08/25/2014 5:16:05 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel

16 posted on 08/25/2014 5:27:00 AM PDT by Brother Cracker ( Mossberg 500 helps me deal with being old and cranky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Martel
I think the “Imperial” marque was born out of the Chrysler - Packard merger.

Chrysler and Packard never merged. Packard merged with Studebaker in the late 1950s. Packards were produced for another year or two after that (actually, they were rebadged Studebakers) before the nameplate disappeared. There was a plan for a 4 way merger between Studebaker, Packard, Nash, and Hudson, but it never materialized. Nash and Hudson then merged to form American Motors.

18 posted on 08/25/2014 5:30:18 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Martel
I think the “Imperial” marque was born out of the Chrysler - Packard merger.

The Imperial was a Chrysler-badged model from 1926 to 1955. In 1956 is was made its own line (like Plymouth or Dodge under Chrylser). Packard merged with Studebaker in the mid 1950s, and, as far as I know, was never owned by Chrysler.

23 posted on 08/25/2014 6:16:23 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson