[humblegunner]

I think the article is more 'valuable' than concern over 'why' a poster likes them as a news source.

So as long as you get sent to his blog, you're just fine with crack-smoking and kid-raping and terrorist funding.

By gum, he wrote something designed to appeal to you.

Lets all throw a few coins at him, because he sent traffic to his blog.

Yeah.

[UCANSEE2]

I've been on many threads that sourced CFP, and I don't ever remember reading about crack-smoking, or kid-raping.

By gum, he wrote something designed to appeal to you.

I don't think the poster wrote the article. IIRC, the author was a woman.

Lets all throw a few coins at him, because he sent traffic to his blog.

I don't want rampant pimp blogging on FR any more than you do. However, many blogs have articles worth reading. So do various news media.

Besides, you have no proof that the original poster is financially associated with CFP, do you ?

Every 'article link' here on FR sends traffic to a blog or MSM website. Is it just this particular blog that is bothering you ?