To: Bratch
The article goes past it being a logical stretch to it simply not being logical. A 21 and 27 year olds' relationship is not perpetuating child abuse, regardless of the domination/submission games they are playing.
Maybe the only worth while feature of "50 shades" is providing is a big target upon which people can vent?
27 posted on
07/31/2014 8:30:29 AM PDT by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: Durus
You should read the article. It makes much more sense than the excerpt. And they are saying that Ana being “21” is not accurate, the book really describes a young girl. They make a compelling argument, in my opinion
30 posted on
07/31/2014 11:43:40 AM PDT by
Shimmer1
(Ok, the joke's over. Bring back the Constitution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson