Posted on 07/23/2014 10:47:10 AM PDT by Faith Presses On
California is going beyond being one of the 19 states currently allowing same-sex "marriage" by revolutionizing the sacred institution even further with Gov. Jerry Brown's (D) signing of Senate Bill 1306, which eradicates from state laws references to "husband and wife."
Progressive media outlets are heralding this change as necessary and overdo.
"California's same-sex couples may now be pronounced spouse and spouse after Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a bill [last] Monday eliminating outdated 'husband and wife' references from state laws," Huffington Post reported. "Senate Bill 1306 was introduced by state Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) to eliminate confusion and correct discriminatory phrasing in the California Constitution that contradicts state law."
Here's what nationally syndicated columnist and Line of Fire host Dr. Michael L. Brown has to say about the Post's interpretation of the law's passage, which he views as just another case of California staying true to "its reputation of pioneering social madness."
(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...
That’s a feature, not a bug.
California is hellbent on self destruction. Let it implode. After all of the totally insane edicts issued by their state, it will be a useless wasteland by the time the crazies there are finished.
Someone should sponsor a bill allowing marriage between humans and animals.
It would bring out the true freaks in government, and it would demonstrate the ridiculousness of the whole effort to redefine marriage.
> It would bring out the true freaks in government, and it would demonstrate the ridiculousness of the whole effort to redefine marriage.
Too late. Already happening. Marriage to animals. The earth. Etc.
Go ahead. Put a form in front of me. Freaks.
It no longer lists “husband” and “wife,” and so as to ensure they are ready for the next set of rulings for legal marriage to dogs and trees and five others, they are going to replace husband and wife with “Entity(1),” “Entity(2),” “Entity(3),” “Entity(4),” “Entity(5),” and “Entity(6).”
Spouses (1 through n)
I should have read through to the end!
I agree that it is overdo, not overdue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.