Replies

Ahhhhh....I think crazy is not a word I would use to describe them.

Let’s call it uninhibited.

Inhibitions are what guide us and prevent us from doing harmful things, to include murder, mistreatment of animals, pissing on the sidewalk...any number of things.

What I am trying to say is that without inhibitions, (cultural norms of behavior) one would appear quite crazy to one who is inhibited.

What progressives have done and are in the process of doing, is to attack religion as the source of evil as they see it, but it is also the source of many of our inhibitions. That is why they appear crazy to you.

In my own lifetime, growing up in the 50s and 60s, my generation shed many of my parents generation’s inhibitions.

Each successive generation is shedding more. Discarding them as garbage. I can agree that some of them were, but not all. Some of those inhibitions were developed over thousands of years to make sure the species survived and they have been honed and perfected since.

I am arguing that what I see happening is quite simple at it’s core and it has nothing to do with defective brains or genetics or psychopathy.

It’s a breakdown of cultural and social guidelines without which society will devolve from this point and may not survive another 100 years as we know it.

Essentially, the only way to control a society that cannot control it’s self is tyranny. It is a natural occurrence as the result of a lack of self control in the populations of the world.

So I find it significant and ironic that the “free love” and “free sex” generation that I was born into, who sought freedom as it’s mantra, is probably partly responsible for what will certainly be the total loss of it.

No, they are not crazy or unhinged. They are uninhibited and are seeking the limit of tolerance.

Eventually, they will find it. Someone will step in and reset the limits and repaint the stripes on the highway. But they will do it by force of arms or by destruction or both and freedom will be lost and not regained for a long time. Assuming the society survives..in part or at all.

Look at the old pics of Bill and Hillary. She fairly reeks of hippychick, although the ambition there would prevent disqualifying records of any such behaviour. Ayres, the mentor of Duh-1, was one such radical, who espoused 'eliminating' those who could not be brought around. These people are tyrannical, totalitarian people who want the world and humanity molded forcefully into the image that suits their short-term goals, be those power, wealth, or the adulation of the masses, and they are willing to do whatever it takes, impose any restriction, perform any act to make that come about, without anything but the thinnest of lip-service to morality and their twisted sense of "justice".

They serve a different master, one who glories in the destruction of humanity because it was created in the image of its creator.

Those behaviours destructive to humans had been laid out in scripture, and were to be avoided. Social guidelines were in place which, if followed, permitted continuity, and while with the New Covenant those restrictions were somewhat eased, fundamental mores were reinforced.

Abandoning them only leads to the bondage of sin, a lessening of freedom for the individual.

Burger King will do without my business, as will other businesses who offend by pushing the agenda of perversion.