Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JPG

Not true.

“The court’s announcement on Tuesday confirmed that its decision did not apply only to the four modes of contraception which the plaintiffs considered a form of abortion. Companies objecting on religious grounds are not obligated to provide contraception coverage as part of the ACA at all.”

http://business-news.thestreet.com/philly/story/supreme-court-clarifies-hobby-lobby-contraception-ruling/1


9 posted on 07/06/2014 4:54:02 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Fuzz

Well, I guess the females who want contraception will have to head to Target and pony up the nine dollars or so.


16 posted on 07/06/2014 5:19:38 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fuzz
Not true.

You are correct. However, the problem remains that the left does not see a difference between a contraceptive and an abortifacient.

21 posted on 07/06/2014 5:39:39 PM PDT by JPG ("So sue me". OK, we will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson