McDaniel’s Team Says It’s Close to Forcing a New Election Against Cochran

BUZZPO ^ | 07-05-2014 | Steven Ahle

[Kevin in California]

Team McDaniel claims they are rapidly approaching the magic number of 7,000 ineligible votes required to force a second runoff against Thad Cochran. After examining votes in 51 of the state’s 82 counties, they have found 4,900 such votes. With 31 counties and 19,000 absentee ballots to check, McDaniel may very well achieve the goal. Absentee ballots are where most voter fraud takes place.

[Wvoter]

#9, you can get a nice US map at Walmart for $5. Find GA. Then find MS. US Geography is a handy thing to know.

[Amendment10]

Isn’t Cochran alleged to have broken the law? And what’s to stop Cochran from buying a second round of votes?

[VMI70]

BUMP!!
You are absolutely correct. Shout it from the hilltops.

[Cboldt]

Look, I know Alabama is between GA and MS, etc. But compared with Carter’s trips to Africa and other farther away digs, Georgia IS in the same neck of the woods as Mississippi.

[deport]

And what’s to stop Cochran from buying a second round of votes?

**************

Heck with enough shots at the pot they may can get somewhere near 100% turnout.
Maybe even over with a little more effort.

[Balding_Eagle]

Those issues are state issues, and should continue to be determined at the state level.

Our Federal Government is already far too powerful, too mean spirited, let’s not hand them another cudgel.

[HiTech RedNeck]

You know that the ink would never, ever go over here. That is gratuitous.

Fingerprint recording might.

[Socon-Econ]

Out-friggin-standing! This is what happens when conservatives decide to fight rather than run away.

[itsahoot]

Until we get back to that, fraud will continue to be rampant.

It matters not one whit what the laws are, voting machines are absolutely designed to elect crooks and tyrants, and current conditions would indicate they are a smashing success.

[BlackElk]

That’s how it would work in Connecticut under common law.

[ZULU]

I pray to God McDaniels beats this, gets to be Senator, gives the Dems, Harry Reid and McConnell such a tough time that their lives are miserable and goes on to become PRESIDENT!!!

He is a FIGHTER and a real MAN.

Just what we NEED.

[ZULU]

Where can I find it?

I want to divest myself of any holdings in those culpable.

[ZULU]

Good. I will NEVER vote again for a McCain, Romney, Bush or ANY OTHER damn RINO.

[Jane Long]

Senate Conservatives Fund has set up a legal defense fund for McDaniel. All donations go directly to this election challenge.

https://2014.senateconservatives.com/challenge/step1?c=b3144af6d19261ac2aec81c27e75ccb5

[DKM]

"Absentee ballots are where most voter fraud takes place"

A better way to say this would be Absentee ballots are where most voter fraud can be detected, due to the hard copy ballots/info involved. Evidence surrounding e-ballot fraud is lost in the netherworld as soon as it happens.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Just wait. Internet voting will clear up all those nasty e-ballot problems. /s

[Neidermeyer]

Those issues are state issues, and should continue to be determined at the state level.
************************
Federal offices are not state issues ,, who they elect is a state issue ,, but insuring that the whole of the country is not impacted by faulty elections is a federal issue ...

You are siding with George Soros who is buying all the Secretary’s of State in order to get fraudulent elections certified against us.

The states could keep their weak , fraud inviting rules if they want ... and they can elect whoever they want using those rules ,,, but for elections to federal offices it is imperative the elections be above board.... I don’t want another JFK elected by Chicago ...

[Kansas58]

NO!
Secret Ballot
Remember?

[Kansas58]

I suggest some training in logic and reading comprehension.

What you just posted, in NO WAY, contradicts what I said, except for the fact that we NO NOT KNOW who they voted for. We only know that they did vote. Get it?

---

“Yes, we can assume such, but in a legal proceeding, we have no proof HOW they voted do we?”
Actually, it’s pretty clearcut. In Mississippi, there is an election law. When you walk in a polling place, you are asked if you will be voting in the Republican primary or the Democrat primary. If you say, “Democrat”. The machine lights up only the names running in the Democratic primary. If you said “Republican”, only the names running as a Republican will light up. If you originally voted in the Democratic primary, you are not allowed to vote BY MISSISSIPPI LAW in the REPUBLICAN run-off (i.e., Cochran/McDaniel). It is illegal there. If you vote one party in a primary; you must vote that same party in any run-off elections.”

[Kansas58]

I suggest some training in logic and reading comprehension.

What you just posted, in NO WAY, contradicts what I said, except for the fact that we NO NOT KNOW who they voted for. We only know that they did vote. Get it?

---

“Yes, we can assume such, but in a legal proceeding, we have no proof HOW they voted do we?”
Actually, it’s pretty clearcut. In Mississippi, there is an election law. When you walk in a polling place, you are asked if you will be voting in the Republican primary or the Democrat primary. If you say, “Democrat”. The machine lights up only the names running in the Democratic primary. If you said “Republican”, only the names running as a Republican will light up. If you originally voted in the Democratic primary, you are not allowed to vote BY MISSISSIPPI LAW in the REPUBLICAN run-off (i.e., Cochran/McDaniel). It is illegal there. If you vote one party in a primary; you must vote that same party in any run-off elections.”