So? What proof can they get that persons did in fact delete the emails. Because it looks suspicious will never pass the mustard. Formatting a hard drive destroys all data. But on the other hand it is puzzling that this hard drive contained just certain emails in question but nothing else was on the drive?
So? What proof can they get that persons did in fact delete the emails. Because it looks suspicious will never pass the mustard. Formatting a hard drive destroys all data. But on the other hand it is puzzling that this hard drive contained just certain emails in question but nothing else was on the drive?
********
There was another part of this interview with the tech guy.
If the complete clip becomes available, it will be posted here.
They’re not gone...... see these posts: (h/t maggief,oldeconomybuyer
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3172288/posts?page=22#22
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3172288/posts?page=105#105
So? What proof can they get that persons did in fact delete the emails. Because it looks suspicious will never pass the mustard. Formatting a hard drive destroys all data. But on the other hand it is puzzling that this hard drive contained just certain emails in question but nothing else was on the drive?
Why is everyone focused on the hard drives when the emails remain on the server even if the user “deletes” them?