Your New Mexico example is what I was pointing out about the 14th. The NM Constitution addresses human beings with God-given rights. The NM Statutes (all of them) address 14A-derived corporate persons and individuals. That’s WHY arguments based on the NM Constitution are given no standing - it is outside of the jurisdiction of the statutes.
Understand, the NM Constitution ONLY applies to NM statutes when the statutes say it does - NOT merely because it exists. And even then, only within the definitions of the statutes, which are based on corporate privilege, not human rights.
They fool everyone because WITHIN corporate law, privileges are allowed to be called rights if the jurisdictional context is clear to legal professionals. But you quickly find out that they are not human rights when you try to invoke them and are told to get lost by the court.
So then, how does one assert that they are not a corporate-person/-individual -- to which a statute is applicable -- but instead a human being?