[Chaguito]

The voters are bar-coded. Run a comparison of bar-codes in the dem primary and in the 6/24 primary. Discard the votes where the bar-codes match. Then, do the recount.

Again, this will require finding an honest judge in MS.

[InterceptPoint]

Discard the votes where the bar-codes match.
++++++++
Do the bar codes connect the voter to his ballot. You need to know who he voted for.

[Praxeologue]

Discard the votes where the bar-codes match.

If the voting machines can match those voter codes to the votes, then yes, your approach works. It would be simple, non-controversial, and would not require recourse to the courts.

[txhurl]

Again, this will require finding an honest judge in MS.

---

The NAACP should be in on this, as Team Barbour solicited [we don’t have proof of bribery YET] rats to crossover for cochroach, and we can assume Team Barbour did not disclose the legal ramifications for RATS that were enticed by both Barbour and whoever runs the RAT table in MS politics.

That alone is chargable, entrapment. Thad’s support structure exposed their black dem catches who did crossover to prosecution for breaking local election laws.

If it can be proven that Thad’s Fix-it team BRIBED black democrats to break the law, that’s RICO.

As we’ve seen, it’s very easy to isolate the ones that voted Rat primary then R Runoff primary.

Going forward, instead of RATS offering 50 bucks to break the law, we need to offer 5000.00 for those who can name those who propositioned them to break the law and crossover for cockroach. Bounty solution. Blast up the MS fraud machine such that it can never find its footing again.