[fwdude]

"Throughout history, the most 'traditional' form of marriage has not been between one man and one woman, but between one man and multiple women, which presumably is not a tradition that defendants and amici would like to continue."

I fail to see how that statement bolsters her 'rationale' for redefining marriage anyway.

[Auntie Dem]

Odd that she should choose polygamy as the definition of “marriage” when it was the Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v U.S. that said the government could define and regulate marriage and they then defined marriage as between one man and one woman. So NOW they’re going to say that definition doesn’t apply anymore? Guess that means polygamy will be back in.