Posted on 06/11/2014 11:25:29 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It’s years of oppression by whitey that is to blame.
Something tells me she knew who it was.
The dog too??????? What a sicko!
Some people are not worth taking in, even if they are relatives.
um... you need a plot AND at least one overt action, don’t you?
You can’t jail someone for saying ‘I’ll kill you’
You can’t even jail someone for saying “i’ll hire someone to kill you”
But once they say that AND hand over some money, then you have at least one overt action to the furtherance of the plot.
I am not a lawyer, I don’t even play one on TV...
She did more than say, “I’ll kill you.” She attempted to get someone to do it.
You probably slept at a Holiday Inn Express though. Right?
Last I checked ‘conspiracy to commit murder’ is still a crime.
Money need not be exchanged.
Title made me think that the woman in question was putting makeup on a boy.
The girl looks just like a frowny face on Facebook messages.
we're just a depraved decadent deceitful and shameful Godless society...
but to have a conspiracy you have to commit one overt act... did you miss the whole point of my post?
watch the TV shows where they nail some poor bastard for hiring a hit man- until he hands over the money they don’t arrest him.
they give him every opportunity to back out- up to that point.
Am I the only one that thought this story was about a woman putting makeup on a boy?
Anybody ever pitch THAT one to you?
So. A woman pretends to be a boy on Facebook in order to talk to her niece? Talk about creepy. Stalkerish creepy. Only to find out she wants her dead. This whole family sounds wacky.
For a "sting" like this to work, it must be believable. ;)
Doesn’t have to be money.
From the article the girl offered to have sex with the ‘boy’.
That could easily be considered ‘payment’ for the ‘hit’.
But, not all states consider conspiracy in and of itself as a crime. Most state and Federal law states that the persons involved need to exchange ‘goods or services’(money also) first before it reaches ‘criminal conspiracy’
But some states still hold that ‘conspiracy’ is still a crime, whether or not an ‘agreement’ has been tenured.
Not sure if the state she lives in does or not.
she talked to someone else about it but that is the agreement between two parties part of the definition, but not the overt act part.
“Federal statutes, and many state statutes, now require not only agreement and intent but also the commission of an Overt Act in furtherance of the agreement.”
I am not sure, since it says ‘many state[s]’ if it applies to her state
She's an adult at 19. Should have kicked her out after the first week. Why did the aunt take her in in the first place? Seems the aunt should have known long before that the gal was a looser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.