Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart
They should STICK TO THEIR STATED FUNDRAISING GOALS and back a CONSERVATIVE. There were other options.

I do not care who that is. If it is a no name, so be it.

I'm very much in tune with that - I voted Constitution Party rather than throw my vote away on lib-lites like Romney or McCain. But since the SCF's endorsement was not exactly brimming with enthusiasm and didn't claim McConnell was a conservative, and since McConnell's re-election would quite conceivably make the Senate less unconservative than would his general election defeat, I think it's hasty to call them hypocrites. (Whether you want to donate to them is a very different question.)

22 posted on 06/11/2014 8:55:51 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

I gotta call it what it is. They screamed the evils of Mitch, then ‘quickly’ endorsed him. What ELSE can it be called?


23 posted on 06/11/2014 8:57:50 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson