Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I’m glad you think the ‘risk is just fine’ for firefighters. Would you be good enough tell us what you do for a living that you feel free to consider the risk of firefighting ‘just fine?’


14 posted on 05/28/2014 11:01:34 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

Aside from my Army service and Airborne, I have spent much of my life in far more dangerous jobs than fireman.

Roofing is almost twice as deadly, and construction, taxi driver, recyler/trash, farming and ranching, fisherman are all more dangerous, many jobs are.

It isn’t like firemen die all the time, obviously men don’t worry about such things, or we wouldn’t be building the world and driving taxis, and delivery trucks, and being fishermen and farmers and ranchers.


19 posted on 05/28/2014 11:10:39 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: EDINVA
Would you be good enough tell us what you do for a living that you feel free to consider the risk of firefighting ‘just fine?’

I used to be a volunteer firefighter. If the department is run correctly, there is very little risk. Every call/situation is thought out in advance, and practised. High risk for high returns, little risk for little rewards, no risk for no rewards. That means one only risks himself to rescue a person. If only the building is at risk, then no risk to personnel is undertaken.

27 posted on 05/29/2014 4:23:41 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson