Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: AZLiberty

the constitution limits the power of the State; the NBA is a private organization. the NBA is thus not constrained by the US Constitution. furthermore, sterling voluntarily agreed to be bound by the NBA Constitution; no one forced him to. finally, while sterling has a right to his noxious, racist views, he does not have a “right” to own an NBA franchise; that is a privilege

finally, it is not clear that sterling was unaware he was being recorded. apparently his mistress was employed as his “archivist” and sterling knew she was recording him, according to some reports.


8 posted on 04/30/2014 12:39:49 PM PDT by ghost of stonewall jackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ghost of stonewall jackson
while sterling has a right to his noxious, racist views, he does not have a “right” to own an NBA franchise; that is a privilege

Exactly. And if some other organization you belong to, say your health club, tries to fine you for your speech, you'd tell them to pound sand.

Difference is, this privelege is so lucrative that Sterling will do whatever they say.

13 posted on 04/30/2014 12:47:12 PM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ghost of stonewall jackson
he does not have a “right” to own an NBA franchise; that is a privilege

So if he is forced to sell, he should be fully compensated at fair market value for his property.

16 posted on 04/30/2014 12:49:17 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson