[sauropod]

That said what is disturbing to me is the invasion of privacy, the violation of free speech, and the overwhelming emotional piling on that everyone seems to be engaged in without a moment’s reflection on what it may mean – down the road – to everyone else in terms of freedom of speech.

To say nothing of depriving a man of his lawfully owned property and his right to enjoy his property.

This is bad, really bad.

[xjcsa]

To say nothing of depriving a man of his lawfully owned property and his right to enjoy his property.

Maybe, maybe not. Did his purchase of the team include an agreement that he would be held to certain standards, and that his actions could result in certain consequences? I'm guessing the answer to that is yes.

[mmichaels1970]

To say nothing of depriving a man of his lawfully owned property and his right to enjoy his property.

As others have said, he would have had to agree by the bylaws of the NBA constitution when he purchased that property.

This is bad, really bad.

What is really bad, IMHO, is that he probably would have gotten into less trouble had he simply punched her in the mouth and kept his mouth shut.

He probably would have gotten into less trouble if he'd kept his mouth shut, went to a bar, got roaring drunk, and ran over a pedestrian out walking the dog.