Posted on 04/21/2014 7:50:21 AM PDT by juliosevero
btt, good thing I’m to old for the job, I’d refuse on religious grounds, Born Again CHRISTIAN!
How can gay games even be legal? Isn’t that discriminatory? Would a “straight “ Olympics be tolerated?
Wells Fargo....our VA mortgage holder, not a thing I can do to protest it. They were not our original mortgage holder, it got sold to them with out our knowledge. We have owned this house a year in June.
I went over to HuffPo to see how they were taking it. They were uniformly hostile to allowing religious objections to driving a cab with a “Gay Games” ad.
I wonder what their viewpoint would be if the driver was gay, and the cab displayed an ad for an organization that helped gays convert to heterosexuality. Or a feminist cabbie if the ad was for “Operation Rescue”?
Agreed. IMHO, there should be a standard clause in every mortgage that it cannot be sold without the mortgagee’s permission.
I owned a house in Louisville from 1983 till 2003. Mortgage got sold five times. Three of those five times the payments got all screwed up. Two of those three times I was threatened by letter with foreclosure. Nice.
No, they wouldn’t. The left would declare open war on Christianity and have it outlawed, the Bible banned, the churches seized and burned, and the followers imprisoned.
No, they wouldn’t. The left would declare open war on Christianity and have it outlawed, the Bible banned, the churches seized and burned, and the followers imprisoned. It is what they want to do anyway.
Gay games? Sounds very unsanitary.
Good for them muslims and the example they set, just don't try to become CEO of the company.
What a dilemma for the MSM.
So where ARE the Christian cabbies in this?
When do the majority act more like Phil Robertson and defy the gaysters?
My guess is Michigan or Minnesota.
I need a scorecard. I can never remember if atheist trumps gay or muslim trumps feminist or transvestite trumps - oh- never mind. I’m getting a headache.
It only means that gays, muslims and the rest of protected groups aren’t that much for their ‘rights’ as they are traditional society which is straight and Christian. They are in alliance and gays aren’t offended as soon as muslims are instrumental to take on Christians.
I mean ‘against traditional society’.
Actually, the Gay Games says they’re open to all athletes no matter their sex preference. It would be funny for some straight athletes to win their events and wear “One Man and One Woman=Marriage” shirts while celebrating their victories.
And just think of their reaction if one would organize Straight Games.
Yeah, I think we already know what that reaction would be like.
The homosexuals and the militant feminists will NEVER challenge the Muslims because they know the Muslims will summarily kill them.
Nope. Only whites, heterosexuals, and Christians are even capable of being bigots. Especially those that are all three.
Thanks for pointing that out.
From their website...
“Join us on the Federation as we work, through art/cultural activities and noncompetitive sports, to support the self-respect of lesbian and gay people around the world and engender respect and understanding from the non-gay world.”
They’re being awfully disingenous. They want it both ways, they want to take credit for being “inclusive”, while at the same time using the “games” as a stage to promote homosexuality. They’re home page says it all - it’s all about gayness, so to make it seem like anything else is pure BS.
If they truly wanted to be inclusive they would start by changing the name, say to “The Games”, and then avoid any proselytizing of their lifestyle or sexual preference during the games.
But don’t we already have something like that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.