First, I’d ask what supreme law of the land had actually been violated and what steps the aggrieved parties had attempted to correct this.
Second, If you want to call it a revolution, be my guest. But the usual Lost Cause position is that it was not. Because if you call it a revolution, you can’t complain about the laws you’ve rejected not protecting you anymore. And complaining about how unfair it all was is what you guys do.
Do you require a comprehensive list of ways the current federal government is out of compliance with the original intent of the Constitution?