So have you seen Lord Monckton’s observation that the document is fake?
Apparently the characters don’t line up in rows and columns as they should if they were typed on an actual typewriter.
When you lay a grid over the entire document, you see horizontal and vertical shifts of a half space or so... something which is impossible for a typewriter to do.
What’s the Ha Ha That’s Very Logical explanation for such a thing?
http://static.infowars.com/2012/06/i/general/peers-briefing-2.pdf
That it's not impossible at all for a typewriter to do that. The typewriter I had in the 60s--a cheap manual from Montgomery Ward--had a button on the end of the platen that would enable it to roll freely rather than in discrete chunks. This process also loosened the machine's grip on the paper, so the paper could easily shift if you weren't careful. But it was handy for quickly moving to a new line (like on a form) compared to repeated carriage returns.
I also don't find it plausible that a forger would have pasted in letters, scanned from who knows where, one or two at a time. It would have been a lot easier and less time-consuming to simply type all the words he needed on a separate piece of paper, scan them all in, and paste them in as complete words.
So for me, Lord Monckton's assertion fails on two points: it's based on a false assumption, and it posits an implausible scenario.