I’ve seen this letter several times, but it is meaningless without seeing the original Common Core problem and methodology for solving it. Has anyone seen it?
There’s some sort of mishmash at the top of the paper.
It’s the rainbows at the top of the paper. The exercise seems to be attempting to teach mental math, where you subtract 100s first, then tens and ones. Not a bad thing, but not a good thing if you haven’t internalized the traditional algorithm first.
The most objectionable thing here is the teacher farming off his job on the parent.
I am a little concerned that perhaps your use of "306" shows an interest in assault weapons, because "306" looks like ".30-06." At least you didn't subtract "308," which would have created a different sort of mystery for us education experts to resolve.
Ultimately, Jack, you did get the right answer to the problem you solved, and so you will get a perfect score. You will be delighted to know that everybody in the class also got a perfect score!
Huh? You can't see the problem? It states quite clearly in the text that Jack did the problem using the number line and got it wrong. Now, the student, instead of explaining in mathematical terms how to do it right, is supposed to write a letter explaining what Jack did right and then show him how to do it right? Get it?
Theh problem and solution using a “number line” is at the top of the picture. Look again.
_________________________________________________
The problem is right there at the top of the sheet of paper.
Don't ask me to explain what Jack was up to in his approach to solve the simple subtraction problem.
In the above example, the "teacher" wants to eliminate the tried-and-true columnar method of addition and subtraction and replace it with a step method (first subtract 300, then ten and then six) to arrive at the answer.
This is, of course, total nonsense and bordering on evil to do this to a kid.
Teach them the columnar method and let the skill develop with practice.
If cops designed houses, we would all live in prison cells. If firemen designed cars, cars would not be allowed to carry gasoline.
Sometimes allowing the professional to set the rules makes for foolish rules.